On Aug 27, 2022, at 4:30 AM, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote: > > lör 2022-08-27 klockan 09:53 +0200 skrev Paul B Mahol: >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:30 AM Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> >> wrote: >> >>> ons 2022-08-24 klockan 23:03 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer: >>>> Also we have regression tests, external libs make that impossible >>>> as the version of external libs can change the behavior. Again >>>> this >>>> is a issue for mxf maybe less so libxml. You can also see that we >>>> have no >>>> tests involving any of the external encoder libs, for that very >>>> reason. >>>> With each external lib that is needed for core features this >>>> would >>>> become a quickly growing problem >>> >>> Testing is certainly a challenge, but almost certainly easier than >>> reimplementing certain formats and codecs poorly, especially MXF. >>> >>> >> Than why you are so called maintainer of thing you do not want to >> maintain? > > Me maintaining mxfdec is precisely why I want to switch to bmx
I strongly oppose to that. Didn’t we just merge IMF support ? That seems to indicate that people are fine with FFmpeg MXF implementation. If the need arises, I will maintain the MXF code, I use it everyday after all :) — Baptiste _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
