Michael Niedermayer (12022-08-15): > It says this now: > "IPFS does not appear to be running.\n\n" > "Installing IPFS locally is recommended to " > "improve performance and reliability, " > That removes the gateway (because it cant be trusted and replaced it > by a litteral recommandition to install their software) > replace loging by code exec ... either you trust them or not
The recommendation was already there, it was not changed by the patch. And it definitely should not be there, it is an error message, not a novel. Furthermore, even the actual error message, "IPFS does not appear to be running", is just wrong. The error message should be something like "IPFS gateway not configured." and the rest in the documentation, starting with which configuration files and environment variables it uses, and including warnings about security and privacy concerns. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
