Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 5:52 AM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Tomas Härdin (12022-08-22): > > I'd actually argue that in that case we should link a library that > > implements IPFS, not split developer effort by trying to implement it > > ourselves. > > Is FFmpeg meant to be just a convenient set of wrappers for existing > libraries, then? > > If not, what is your criterion to decide when splitting developer effort > is worth including a native version in FFmpeg. > I think it usually comes down to a developer wanting to, you know, spend time on it. As an example: if Tomas (or anyone) wants to write native IPFS: great. Otherwise, we can accept an external lib for it. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
