Tomas Härdin (12022-08-22): > I'd actually argue that in that case we should link a library that > implements IPFS, not split developer effort by trying to implement it > ourselves.
Is FFmpeg meant to be just a convenient set of wrappers for existing libraries, then? If not, what is your criterion to decide when splitting developer effort is worth including a native version in FFmpeg. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".