Tomas Härdin (12022-08-22):
> I'd actually argue that in that case we should link a library that
> implements IPFS, not split developer effort by trying to implement it
> ourselves.

Is FFmpeg meant to be just a convenient set of wrappers for existing
libraries, then?

If not, what is your criterion to decide when splitting developer effort
is worth including a native version in FFmpeg.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to