Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-07-02 14:56:50) > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 10:38:26AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-07-01 21:53:00) > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:55:46AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > Variant 2 is less bad, but the whole check seems hacky to me, since it > > > > seems to make assumptions about swr defaults > > > > > > > > Won't setting this unconditionally have the same effect? > > > > > > it has the same effect but its not so nice to the user to recommand extra > > > arguments which make no difference > > > > Sorry, I don't follow. What is recommending any arguments to the user > > here? > > i meant this thing here: > ./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -async 1 -f null - 2>&1 | grep async > > -async is forwarded to lavfi similarly to -af > aresample=async=1:min_hard_comp=0.100000:first_pts=0. > > vs. > > -async is forwarded to lavfi similarly to -af aresample=async=1:first_pts=0.
I don't see a problem - why would the user care how it is forwarded? -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
