On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 10:38:26AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-07-01 21:53:00) > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:55:46AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > Variant 2 is less bad, but the whole check seems hacky to me, since it > > > seems to make assumptions about swr defaults > > > > > > Won't setting this unconditionally have the same effect? > > > > it has the same effect but its not so nice to the user to recommand extra > > arguments which make no difference > > Sorry, I don't follow. What is recommending any arguments to the user > here?
i meant this thing here: ./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -async 1 -f null - 2>&1 | grep async -async is forwarded to lavfi similarly to -af aresample=async=1:min_hard_comp=0.100000:first_pts=0. vs. -async is forwarded to lavfi similarly to -af aresample=async=1:first_pts=0. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
