On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 01:12:36 +0200 Lynne <d...@lynne.ee> wrote: > 28 Mar 2022, 23:13 by ffm...@haasn.xyz: > > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:31:36 +0200 Lynne <d...@lynne.ee> wrote: > > > >> I'm not okay with this. I don't mind anyone pushing approved patches, > >> but I still want to review and have final say on all Vulkan code. Could you > >> change that? > >> > > > > The contents of vf_libplacebo is not "Vulkan code". The only thing > > Vulkan about it is the minimal plumbing between AVFrame and libplacebo, > > most of which is actually already happening inside libplacebo's codebase > > (<utils/libav.h`) where I already have complete control over it. > > > > Device creation's still done from the lavu-side of things.
Right, but this is outside the scope of vf_libplacebo which is what I'm being added as the maintainer for. With that being said, is there still any objection to me being added as a maintainer for **vf_libplacebo** specifically? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
