28 Mar 2022, 23:13 by ffm...@haasn.xyz: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:31:36 +0200 Lynne <d...@lynne.ee> wrote: > >> I'm not okay with this. I don't mind anyone pushing approved patches, >> but I still want to review and have final say on all Vulkan code. Could you >> change that? >> > > The contents of vf_libplacebo is not "Vulkan code". The only thing > Vulkan about it is the minimal plumbing between AVFrame and libplacebo, > most of which is actually already happening inside libplacebo's codebase > (<utils/libav.h`) where I already have complete control over it. >
Device creation's still done from the lavu-side of things. > If anything, I still want to move this filter away from being > Vulkan-exclusive in the future, which would make it even more decoupled > from your concern. > I explicitly told you that's okay when the filter first got merged, but you didn't change it back then, and I've been waiting for you to enable it. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".