On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 10:23:44AM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 10/7/2021 10:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, at 11:35, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > I do plan to make releases from > > > 4.4, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0, 3.4, 3.2, 2.8 branches > > > why ? > > > > I think this is too many to maintain. > > > > I would argue you should only support: > > 2.8, 3.2, 3.4, 4.1 and 4.4 > > > > 2.8 (Ubuntu LTS 16.04 + RHEL7) > > Ubuntu ended support for 16.04 last April. And is the ffmpeg RHEL7 package > official, or is it one of the Distros that shipped libav and users provided > custom ffmpeg packages for them (Like SUSE)?
ubuntu still has some extended support for 16.04 https://ubuntu.com/security/esm iam not sure that would cover ffmpeg though [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws. -- Plato
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
