On Sun, 15. Aug 16:04, Nicolas George wrote: > Andriy Gelman (12021-08-15): > > That sounds fine. > > See the attached code. > > I have tested it against the 2721 commits I have since the beginning of > the year, it finds 56 to object, about half of them real problems, a few > with unusually long context (I set the limit at the last percentile) and > admittedly a few exceptional case. > > Since these are warnings and can safely be ignored, I think it is an > acceptable rate of false-positives. >
Thanks, I added the code: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/tencent_68cdca7422be728d27ea9e3a911e4d86b...@qq.com/ I'll set up the automated emails for this later. -- Andriy _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
