Em dom., 11 de abr. de 2021 às 14:53, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> escreveu: > > Anton Khirnov (12021-04-11): > > We are a generic multimedia framework. "the field" for us is multimedia > > in general, so we should use names meaningful in general multimedia > > context. > > I mostly agree with Lynne, "bounding box" is confusing and misleading > > when this structure is built around object detection and classification. > > I agree with both of you. When faced with this kind of choice, we must > choose the wording that will be as clear and not confusing as possible > for people familiar with general concepts of video encoding but not > necessarily familiar with the jargon of any particular sub-field. The > specialists of the particular subfield are supposed to be more capable > of adjusting. > Personally, "bounding box" is very clear to me, I might be biased. It seems we are bikeshedding over a naming. I think it is more constructive if we propose a better name as the only other option proposed until now seems worst to me.
I think something like "AV_SIDE_DATA_DETECTION_BOUNDING_BOX" is reasonable, as it conveys what it is and what it is used for. > Also, I have observed that the jargon of a narrow field is frequently > made of awful misnomers kept more as cargo cult than for any good > reason. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
