> On Apr 9, 2015, at 06:08, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:02:50 +0200 > Lukasz Marek <lukasz.m.lu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> W dniu środa, 8 kwietnia 2015 Gilles Chanteperdrix < >> gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org> >> >> And forgot to add my apologies for these bad patches and the noise >>> that followed. >>> >> >> No need for that. >> >> Your demuxer seems to use public API only so you can try to move this >> implementation to your project and register this demuxer from your >> application. > > I'm pretty sure implementing a demuxer requires using private API. > > What's more, this stuff doesn't make sense as a demuxer. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Agreed, this belongs in a higher layer. I think it'd be reasonable for FFmpeg to have a higher-layer library handling things like playlists and this, but that's another conversation. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
