On 9 April 2015 at 12:17, Rodger Combs <rodger.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 9, 2015, at 06:08, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:02:50 +0200 >> Lukasz Marek <lukasz.m.lu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> W dniu środa, 8 kwietnia 2015 Gilles Chanteperdrix < >>> gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org> >>> >>> And forgot to add my apologies for these bad patches and the noise >>>> that followed. >>>> >>> >>> No need for that. >>> >>> Your demuxer seems to use public API only so you can try to move this >>> implementation to your project and register this demuxer from your >>> application. >> >> I'm pretty sure implementing a demuxer requires using private API. >> >> What's more, this stuff doesn't make sense as a demuxer. >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > Agreed, this belongs in a higher layer. I think it'd be reasonable for FFmpeg > to have a higher-layer library handling things like playlists and this, but > that's another conversation.
+1 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
