James Almer (12021-02-01): > I support the idea of it being a build option (Perhaps simply > --enable-libev, like any other external dep). There's a precedent of > external libraries being used as backend for certain features, with the most > prominent example being libsoxr as the resample engine in libswresample. > > This of course as long as it's not autodetected, so FATE clients don't use > it. The last thing we want is the internal implementation being neglected > because all devs use libev.
Thanks for the feedback. I agree with all this, although I suspect the "certain features" brought by libev would prove to be just a slight performance enhancement in extreme cases. But interacting with any event loop is a necessary feature, and as such it needs to be properly implemented and tested. Are there other remarks on this? Otherwise I shall start the code proper. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
