> 2021年1月4日 下午9:44，Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> 写道： > > Kieran Kunhya (12021-01-02): >> In my opinion we should use libev as the default and make it a submodule >> (possibly as part of some sort of plugin system for event loops). This >> allows us to use modern things such as io_uring as they come. > > I can be on board with that, since I like libev very much, and I find it > matches well the philosophy of FFmpeg's coding practices. > > But I am afraid I am not the one who will need convincing on this. > > Making sure any event loop can be used with a pluggable system is, IMHO, > an absolute requisite. Based on this, providing a basic event loop, > enough to run most of our protocols, would be compatible with FFmpeg's > habits, and not that much work. And libev can be used if available for > more complex protocols or better performance. > > But as I said, I would be fine with libev the main, Is that mean I must enable libev if I use ffmpeg, or must enable libev if I use libav* API? Or do you mean I can configure by myself if I don’t want use third part lib in ffmpeg?
> official event loop > for the project. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". Thanks Steven Liu _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
