Feb 10, 2021, 14:34 by an...@khirnov.net: > Quoting Lynne (2021-02-10 14:15:29) > >> Feb 10, 2021, 11:45 by an...@khirnov.net: >> >> > Quoting Lynne (2021-02-08 20:13:39) >> > >> >> Feb 8, 2021, 15:23 by j...@videolan.org: >> >> > + >> >> > +The decisions from the TC are final, until the matters are reopened >> >> > after >> >> > +no less than one year, by either the GA or the TC auto-seizing. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Is there an OR there? Can the question be raised again after more than >> >> a year by anyone, OR at any time by either the GA or the TC? >> >> >> > >> > I'd say after more than a year through the normal process. So best to >> > drop the part after the comma to avoid confusion. >> > >> >> I think an OR should be added. The TC or GA should be able to say >> "oh, we really screwed it up, now it turns out we absolutely need this" >> without waiting a full year. >> > > It's redundant. GA can already vote on whatever it wants, all the rules > exist only because GA agrees on them. > And the cases of "we fucked up bad, absolutely need to change this" > should be rare enough to not need a special rule. >
Oh, sorry, I misread it as "drop the comma". If the part after the comma is removed the document looks good to me. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
