Quoting Lynne (2021-02-10 14:15:29) > Feb 10, 2021, 11:45 by an...@khirnov.net: > > > Quoting Lynne (2021-02-08 20:13:39) > > > >> Feb 8, 2021, 15:23 by j...@videolan.org: > >> > + > >> > +The decisions from the TC are final, until the matters are reopened > >> > after > >> > +no less than one year, by either the GA or the TC auto-seizing. > >> > > >> > >> Is there an OR there? Can the question be raised again after more than > >> a year by anyone, OR at any time by either the GA or the TC? > >> > > > > I'd say after more than a year through the normal process. So best to > > drop the part after the comma to avoid confusion. > > > > I think an OR should be added. The TC or GA should be able to say > "oh, we really screwed it up, now it turns out we absolutely need this" > without waiting a full year.
It's redundant. GA can already vote on whatever it wants, all the rules exist only because GA agrees on them. And the cases of "we fucked up bad, absolutely need to change this" should be rare enough to not need a special rule. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
