On 12/6/2020 8:34 PM, Jan Ekström wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:23 AM Jan Ekström <jee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 5:44 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Create a local one instead from a byte buffer input argument.

Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>

The actual change mentioned in the commit message is LGTM, and the
updated sanity checks seem good (since now the alternatives at that
point are either 3+3 (2094-40) or 3+4 (closed captions)), but they are
pretty separate from the actual change of this commit. So in that
sense it might make sense to just separate them into their own fixup
commit when pushing. Or at least mention the sanity check fixups in
the commit message instead of them being a silent good change.

For the record, I only now grasped after it being mentioned that what
I took for just sanity check fixups are actually needed for the gdc
changes since otherwise the size variable's value is out-of-sync.

So yea, overall LGTM as long as that part of the change set is
mentioned, since otherwise it just looked like nice (but unrelated)
sanity check fixups.

Jan

Split it in two since it's cleaner that way, and applied it.

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to