On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:10:17AM -0400, compn wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:47:55 +0000 > Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > answer to that is a *single* decoder, which works the best - > > just say it with less words. you dont want dual decoders like prores.
i strongly want to avoid dual decoders and this is part of why i ever replied to this thread The situation ATM is that the dts/dca decoder in FFmpeg has features that are missing in Libav. If niels patch is rebased onto FFmpeg and Marcus works on top of FFmpeg either before or after niels patch then theres just one decoder that has all features and bugfixes But if Marcus rebases his work on top of Niels work before this is rebased onto FFmpeg then his work and Niels work will be on Libav and the FFmpeg decoder will have features missing in Libav so we will then have 2 decoders like in prores or someone will have to merge them which will require at least testcases to test the features, and thats why i asked for testcases I want to avoid 2 decoders but whenever i mention "use FFmpeg" i get accused of being "anti Libav" or "butthurt" or various other things If people cooperate and produce 1 DCA/DTS decoder with all features then we will have 1, otherwise there might be 2 I hope my mail is not misunderstood again [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 2 "100% positive feedback" - "All either got their money back or didnt complain" "Best seller ever, very honest" - "Seller refunded buyer after failed scam"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
