On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:04:39PM +0000, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 3/11/2015 8:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > whats important is a patchset based on and tested on FFmpeg, at least
> > if people want a working decoder in FFmpeg
> 
> No, what's important is that the best possible code is used. Origin is
> irrelevant.

you misunderstood me

Thats analogous to saying "no its not important to put fuel in a
car, its important to drive the best car"

Of course the best possible code should be used but that either is
based on FFmpeg and tested on FFmpeg already or it needs to be
git rebased / merged onto FFmpeg and then tested.
the 2nd is more work, so i suggest that new code is based on top of
FFmpeg already. Merge/rebase that patchset from Libav if you want
to work on top of it.

The more code is rebased and merged around the higher the risk of
bugs

Also if someone has testcases for all the new DCA features, i would
be interrested to have them so i can test these things if/when needed

Thanks

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in
ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners. -- Vladimir Lenin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to