Quoting Nicolas George (2020-05-20 10:47:57) > Anton Khirnov (12020-05-20): > > For what my opinion is worth, I agree with Lynne here. Messing with > > OpenGL global state in the libraries is something we absolutely should > > not do. > > Good thing we would not be "messing with" anything. We would be using > the global OpenGL state at the request of the user.
To a calling program, this demuxer would appear as any other demuxer. Many programs using libavformat will take the demuxer name from the user and use it as-is, which might break them in non-obvious ways if they use OpenGL themselves. > Could we stop the fallacious implicit argument that the OpenGL devices > and filters would be used randomly rather than be explicitly requested > by users? If the users want to use that component and know the > consequences, who are you to deny them, seriously? Could you please stop with this utterly infuriating discussion style? I mean this passive-aggressive "we" and presenting your personal opinions as absolute inviolable truths. I would highly appreciate it if you considered the possibility that - your opinions are just that - your opinions; they are not necessarily right - other people may have opinions that disagree with yours; that does not necessarily mean they are wrong I know I am not alone in the impression that arguing with you is pointless since you seem to treat discussions as something that you need to win and disregard any arguments you disagree with. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
