On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 9:47:12 AM Andreas Cadhalpun < andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 01.02.2015 18:30, Timothy Gu wrote: > > On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 9:01:04 AM Andreas Cadhalpun < > > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> On 01.02.2015 16:44, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>> doxygen doc/Doxyfile > >>> would lack the revission > >> > >> Yes, one has to use the doxy-wrapper to get the revision: > >> doc/doxy-wrapper.sh ./ doc/Doxyfile doxygen > >> > >> Is that a problem? > >> > > > > The "API" documentation on ffmpeg.org is generated with `doxygen > > doc/Doxyfile`. > > Surely that can be changed to above doxy-wrapper call. > Yes. > If you care about that, one could also leave the 'HTML_TIMESTAMP = YES' > in the Doxyfile and just add 'HTML_TIMESTAMP = NO' to the doxy-wrapper. > > That way, everyone using the doxy-wrapper gets a reproducible output > (with the git revision) and nothing changes for those directly calling > 'doxygen doc/Doxyfile'. > That sounds like a good idea. Timothy _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
