Hi,
On 01.02.2015 18:30, Timothy Gu wrote:
On Sun Feb 01 2015 at 9:01:04 AM Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 01.02.2015 16:44, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
doxygen doc/Doxyfile
would lack the revission
Yes, one has to use the doxy-wrapper to get the revision:
doc/doxy-wrapper.sh ./ doc/Doxyfile doxygen
Is that a problem?
The "API" documentation on ffmpeg.org is generated with `doxygen
doc/Doxyfile`.
Surely that can be changed to above doxy-wrapper call.
Not that I support doing that (as it includes private
symbols too), but better not break existing scripts.
Any script using 'doxygen doc/Doxyfile' won't break, the created html
files would just lack the date.
If you care about that, one could also leave the 'HTML_TIMESTAMP = YES'
in the Doxyfile and just add 'HTML_TIMESTAMP = NO' to the doxy-wrapper.
That way, everyone using the doxy-wrapper gets a reproducible output
(with the git revision) and nothing changes for those directly calling
'doxygen doc/Doxyfile'.
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
