Hi, On December 3, 2014 6:39:12 PM GMT+01:00, Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >2014-12-03 18:32 GMT+01:00 Benoit Fouet <benoit.fo...@free.fr>: >> When the overhead here is high, then it means that we are going to >perform a >> lot on the frame itself, looping using byte buffers. >> I believe this is a good compromise (and also I had up to 20% better >> performances on the APNG samples I have). > >I have just benchmarked on a few animated pngs, and it's >systematically much better here. >
Cool, and also thanks for testing this! -- Ben _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
