On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:47:51PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIII, Benoit Fouet a écrit : > > Fixes ticket #1598 > > --- > > libavformat/mpegtsenc.c | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Are the produced files valid? If they are, why do the test at all? If they > are not, can this be considered actually a fix for the issue?
its allowed to have some timestamps missing in TS under some circumstances. so it might be possible to generate a valid file with the first pts missing (i dont know for sure, id have to check the spec) also iam not sure what our muxer makes out of that case. Its certainly better to have valid timestamps on the muxer input on all frames and let the muxer decide which to store in the file and which to ommit calculating valid timestamps for h264/hevc input that ommits some is not entirely trivial though [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
