Le primidi 1er vendémiaire, an CCXXIII, Thomas Volkert a écrit : > There were enough votes declining this fast patch. That's okay. > Yes, you are right. This patch could cause some confusion in the future. > > See https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3936 for the origin of this patch. > The idea/patch is no longer pursued.
Thanks for the explanations. I see this in the ticket discussion: # FFmpeg(AV muxer) ==> APP ==> FFmpeg(RTP muxer) This looks strange to me: what is the "AV muxer" for exactly? Why not just five the packets to the RTP muxer? # This is useful to create verbose statistics about each individual data # stream in the application. It seems to me that you could gather the statistics from the AVPackets before the muxer, could you not? # this structure is needed to use also proprietary RTP packetizers beside the # ones from ffmpeg. This looks interesting. Can you explain what is missing from the API to be able to use them? And also: what packetizer are missing from FFmpeg? Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
