On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:38:15PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 02:35:40PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > On 28.08.2014 20:06, Nicolas George wrote: > > >Le primidi 11 fructidor, an CCXXII, Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : > > >>I like this colour of the shed. ;) > > >> * move lena.pnm to the FATE samples > > >> * add e.g. mona_lisa.pnm and duplicate the vsynth2 tests (as vsynth4?) > > >> > > >>Has someone a problem with this solution? > > > > > >I find it very good. > > > > > >Just a small nitpick: does the image have to be 256×256? If not, I suggest > > >to make mona_lisa.pnm 256×384 or 192×288, to avoid cropping the original. > > > > Yes, 256×384 fits better. > > Attached is a patch on top of the one removing tests/lena.pnm, adding > > tests/mona_lisa.pnm and vsynth4 tests. > > > > Best regards, > > Andreas > > Duplicate all the tests? Yeah please no, that's a hell to maintain. > > lena.pnm can be moved to the FATE samples, and replaced in the repo by > something else. > > The question is still by what we replace it. This can be the mona lisa but > the reason of the presence of lena.pnm is that it's extremely famous in > the image processing world, and so we should replace it with something > similar. Typically, mandrill.bmp could be a good candidate: > https://encrypted.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=mandrill.bmp&tbs=imgo:1 > > ...but I don't know the license either. >
But again, as you can see on http://eskeptrical.blogspot.com/2012/01/lena.html for example, it is a more appropriate image. -- Clément B.
pgpnJK2AP94Fz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
