On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:55:40PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > On 28.08.2014 17:53, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > >ffplay http://lucy.pkh.me/lena.pnm > > > > > >File size and dimensions are the same, and we can of course keep the file > > >name since the person looks like Lena a bit. > > > > > >Would that one be OK? > > > > > >According to http://goo.gl/0K3qyP it should be OK as long as the > > >attribution is kept, which can be done in the commit message. > > > > The licensing would be OK, but, seriously, do you want such an image in > > FFmpeg's source? > > > > If you want to keep the original filename, why not use a real Lena [1] > > image, e.g.: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lena_Zavaroni_927-0962.jpg > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Headey,_Lena_(2007).jpg > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lena_Yada.jpg > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lena_Meyer-Landrut_at_PC_after_2010_Eurovision_2.jpg > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LenaHasesSlim.jpg > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AlexisBledelSept11TIFF.jpg > > > > Joke aside, I just found this: > http://blog.ricbit.com/2009/11/lena-e-ilena.html
these are all jpeg and not raw, for the purpose of research a raw
or lossessly compressed image would be better.
for regression tests it shouldnt matter though
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no
further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
