On 2014-08-28 07:23 -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Alexander Strasser <eclip...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 2014-05-23 00:28 +0200, Alexander Strasser wrote:
> >> On 2014-05-11 01:37 +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> >> > Am Donnerstag 01 Mai 2014, 23:48:29 schrieb Alexander Strasser:
> >> > > alternative. What do you and/or others think of it?
> >> > >
> >> > >   Besides validation I couldn't yet properly test what feed
> >> > > readers make of it. So please forgive me if it causes obvious
> >> > > problems with your reader.
> >> > (As said offline already) My reader works with it.
> >
> >   My patch still works I think. I would like to commit it,
> > though it won't be flexible enough to add much other stuff
> > that needs more elaborate logic. I want to apply it, because
> > it is a neat feature to have now.
> 
> Good to hear you are still working on this.
> 
> > Any objections to this?
> 
> LGTM from me, assuming it is tested and works. I slightly prefer your
> patch over Gerion's, but both are OK.

  Thanks. Pushed mine.

  Alexander

> >
> >   In the not-so-short term I intend to widen security checks
> > for the repo on the server to other files than just the Makefile.
> > I already started this work, but need to fix one known problem
> > before I can put it to work on the server.
> 
> Yes, that would be much better. The awk and sed hack is getting too
> cumbersome. Or we could just change the server host.

Attachment: pgp8gLTQw62yO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to