Hi! On 2014-05-23 00:28 +0200, Alexander Strasser wrote: > On 2014-05-11 01:37 +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote: > > Am Donnerstag 01 Mai 2014, 23:48:29 schrieb Alexander Strasser: > > > alternative. What do you and/or others think of it? > > > > > > Besides validation I couldn't yet properly test what feed > > > readers make of it. So please forgive me if it causes obvious > > > problems with your reader. > > (As said offline already) My reader works with it.
My patch still works I think. I would like to commit it, though it won't be flexible enough to add much other stuff that needs more elaborate logic. I want to apply it, because it is a neat feature to have now. Any objections to this? In the not-so-short term I intend to widen security checks for the repo on the server to other files than just the Makefile. I already started this work, but need to fix one known problem before I can put it to work on the server. > I sent a new series for this: > > Subject: [PATCH 0/5] web: Extend RSS When what I described in the above paragraph is online, I could push the better solution that I quoted above. Alexander > > It would be nice to set the > > pubtime as well (an example: <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 18:28:18 > > CEST</pubDate>). > > This command should work more less to build the date: > > date '+%a, %d %b %Y %T %Z' -d parsed_date > > (similar to date '+%c' btw) you have to keep in mind the locale, too. > > Good point. Actually I think I need to check where the time > formatting code in my new patch is getting the locale from... > > > See here > > (http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html#optionalChannelElements) > > for the spec. > > [...]
pgppqJ6bGthd3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
