On Monday May 16 2011 08:36:40 Johan Hake wrote: > Sounds good! > > > 1. Release 0.9.11 now > > I guess this means sometime early this week?
No, I guess it means now! ;) Sorry for the spam... Johan > Johan > > > 2. Release 0.9.12 2011-05-31 > > 3. Release 1.0.0-rc1 2011-06-14 > > > > No new features should be added after this point and all known > > bugs (unless we decide to push them to post 1.0) should have > > been fixed. > > > > 4. Release rc2, rc3, ... if necessary > > 5. Release 1.0.0 when ready > > > > Between 3 and 4, all depending packages (like cbc.solve etc) have a > > chance to make updates to any interface changes and everyone is > > encouraged to test the release candidate. > > > > How long should this window be? I'd like a very short window (like a > > week). Opinions? > > > > Another thing to discuss is how to handle versioning of packages post > > 1.0. It's practical for users if DOLFIN, UFL, FFC, FIAT have the same > > version numbers. On the other hand, it's not practical for developers. > > In particular, FIAT usually makes less frequent updates than the other > > packages. > > > > Yet another thing to discuss is whether we want to require that all > > 1.x versions work together, so for example one can assume that FFC > > 1.0.3 works with DOLFIN 1.0.9. In general, I think we need to pay more > > attention to versioning and compatibility post 1.0. > > > > Johannes has also mentioned to me a requirement in Debian for binary > > compatibility with shared libraries. Johannes, could you say something > > about this? > > > > -- > > Anders > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:24:49PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > > > Good idea. I just talked to Anders and Kent last week about the need > > > for a testing period with feature freeze before 1.0 is released. After > > > this release we should figure out how the release process up to 1.0 > > > should be, also in relation with the book. > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 16 May 2011 12:13, Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > I suggest now would be a good point to make new releases of UFL, FFC > > > > and DOLFIN. There have been a number of improvements to UFL, FFC > > > > caching, and there have been a good number of DOLFIN bugs fixes. New > > > > version numbers would be: > > > > > > > > UFL: 0.9.1 > > > > FFC: 0.9.1 > > > > DOLFIN: 0.9.12 > > > > > > > > Jump in quick if there is anything that you would like do before a > > > > release. > > > > > > > > Garth > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > > > > Post to : dol...@lists.launchpad.net > > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ufl > > > Post to : u...@lists.launchpad.net > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ufl > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > > Post to : dol...@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dol...@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
