On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:53:03PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote: > > > On 16. mai 2011, at 13:07, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > > > The suggested plan is as follows: > > > > 1. Release 0.9.11 now > > 2. Release 0.9.12 2011-05-31 > > 3. Release 1.0.0-rc1 2011-06-14 > > > > No new features should be added after this point and all known > > bugs (unless we decide to push them to post 1.0) should have > > been fixed. > > > > 4. Release rc2, rc3, ... if necessary > > 5. Release 1.0.0 when ready > > > > Between 3 and 4, all depending packages (like cbc.solve etc) have a > > chance to make updates to any interface changes and everyone is > > encouraged to test the release candidate. > > > > Sounds good to me, though "when ready" is not a very definite term.
Def: when we have fixed all bugs found during a testing window of length to be determined below... > > How long should this window be? I'd like a very short window (like a > > week). Opinions? > > A week is fine as long as one knows approximately when this week is going to > be :-) At the release of 1.0.0-rc1 scheduled for 2011-06-14. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
