nah, not my job, as I said before, I have spoken many times of it in the mailing lists.. and it would take alot more then one user before mandrake listened... if 500 users switched to gShield and they all told mandrake, then maybe they would consider it... (at the very least, they really should copy the txt config file format.. its fantastic.)
Incidently, there is a GUI app for setting up gShield.. its on the site.. I've never used it and have no idea how good it is.. I've never needed it.. its way easy without the gui and for the most part, if I can do something easily without the GUI, then I will. more FYI :-) rgds Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim C Sent: Sunday, 1 December 2002 2:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Shorewall Follies - It's drivin' me NUTS!! Why not suggest it? Surely they must have a means of getting input from thier users and if they don't have a suggestion box perhaps they should get one. Franki wrote: > yeah, the new 2.8 version of gShield has alot of extra stuff I hadn't > expected.. > > Its one very good firewall.. > > I've been using it for about 2 years or so now.. > > Mandrake should ditch shorewall, and pickup gSheild as the default, it has a > ton of stuff that to my knowledge shorewall doesn't.. even support for stuff > you have to patch iptables to use.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
