This is very deja-vu - didn't we go thru all this about how and where to quote not too long ago ? Or was it on the newbie list ? Either way, it was off topic then and is now. Can you give it a rest ? philomena At 04:34 PM 11/3/2000 +0100, you wrote: >So sprach John Wittkamper am Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:42:56AM -0800: > > Not only that, the new stuff should be at the TOP of the reply > > rather than the bottom. For the few that need context, it is there, > >And wrong again. The new stuff should be right below what you are quoting, >so that the references are as clear as can be. > >Now compare my message in size to your "bloated" IMO message. It's smaller. >Isn't that better? If you need context, go back to the original message. >Ain't that hard. > >Alexander Skwar >-- >Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx >Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys >ICQ: 7328191 > >Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: >Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
