It would have been easier and FASTER if;
1) you knew what you were doing...
2) unplug for a bit and stop blaming the folks on the list that offer
their knowledge and help for FREE
3) used 'kpackage' instead of the program you used because 'kpackage' is
what is used to INSTALL RPM's with.
But then again...I can't see or think straight when I'm REALLY frustrated
and upset either, although the last ones I'm going to yell at are the ones
that are giving me FREE tech support!
--
Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------------
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
** <_||_> in the making of this |
** =\/= message... | Registered Linux user #182496
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Mallard wrote:
> Thanks for wasting the two hours I had today to do some programming!
>
> I was compiling just fine in 7.0 after figuring out how to install
> everything I needed. now I do a clean install of 7.1 "developer" and
> everything else is installed to compile C++ except the libsrcc++ or
> whatever you call it.
>
> Make can't find fstream.h a basic every day file it should have if you
> install "developer" I would think.
>
> So I go to your BUGGY drakRPM and click on the install for the RPM and
> it asks for cdrom2. Like I know what that is. I put in the "sources" CD,
> figuring that is #2 because there were only two CD's in 7.1 I got for
> $30.
>
> It spins the CD and sits there looking like a typical BUGGY windows
> program, not telling me it didn't find "cdrom2" or maybe the file wasn't
> there, who knows.
>
> HOW ABOUT SOME USER FEEDBACK ONCE AND A WHILE? Did you guys forget how
> to bring up a dialog box and print into it? No, instead let's let the
> user guess what's happening.
>
> Besides that, what lame program dissapears while it's "updating RPM
> base" ? I have never seen anything like that before, makes you think it
> crashed. Who is teaching these kids to program now days?
>
> Then I do another lame thing, go into file manager root>mnt>cdrom so I
> can see my cdrom (no mandrake couldn't have made little easy to find
> links for them, too busy playing doom or something to spend 2 minutes
> making things easier for the 1000's of users that will get your dist) -
> then I find the file is on the main CD, but no it's not the file, it's
> some other c++ goodie I have no clue what is for, so I don't think it's
> here at all. WHY NOT? Is there a more $$ version with this ONE FILE in
> it?
>
> OK, so I go to the main site and do a search, try it, try to find it.
> What the hell was it called? I don't remember, should have writen it
> down. But geeks always write this stuff down, that's the point, we want
> you to not have a life like we do, suffer like us, that's what Linux is
> all about, "I wasted my life figuring this out, so I will now make
> others do it too!" - is that the motto here?
>
> So I decide to get smart ass, I am gonna get it from 7.0 and screw you
> too! So I find it on 7.0, no thanks to the BROKEN search feature in
> drakeRPM, looking for fstream.h, and the way you have to tell it to go
> look on the cdrom, what type of user interface is that called?
>
> I find it and try to use kpackage to install it. It does, but in
> usr/include/c++-2/ that's the secret directory. So now it should make
> just fine, RIGHT?
>
> No, because make or gcc or whatever is configured to look in another
> newer directory that mandrake made up FOR SOME REASON (HINT HINT???)
> called c++-3 even though it's the same files. So like the smart ass I am
> I make a directory called that and put the files in there.
>
> AH HA! make finds the files and compiles, but wait! MORE ERRORS? on a
> program that compiled just fine before? YES!! ios() has errors! it
> didn't before, so now what???
>
> Well my 2 hours are up, I wasted my life like you wanted. THANK YOU!
>
> You guys owe me a new updated 7.1 CD set when you get your act together.
> I am calling your customer service line and returning this crap back to
> you. BAD JOB on this one!
>
> Now I have to waste more time re-installing 7.0 so I can do a simple
> make. WHAT A JOKE!
>
> I gave you $30 instead of updating 7.0 because I thought I would
> contribute to the effort, I was wrong.
>
>
