201 messages in 24 hours.
This list IS the newbie list - (almost) nothing but idle chatter, bickering,
"thank you" and ME TOO posts.
Folks at Linux-Mandrake - 7.0 is either REALLY REALLY broken (which
the PCMCIA STILL is), or you need to set and ENFORCE some ground rules for
participation on your lists. How about a moderator? It already takes 3
hours to get a mail to the list, which, by the way, really drags out the
life of a thread since dozens post with the answer when the first one would
likely have ended the thread (well, after a few more ME TOOs and Thank
Yous).
Finding decent info through all this offal is impossible and an incredible
waste of cycles - this thread is a prime example.
My company (largest reseller of Compaq IA AND Alpha, largest
reseller of Intel "white" and until last week largest reseller of IBM
Netfinity) is a Certified Red Hat Reseller, and I'm an RHCE - but I've
always pushed L-M to the desktop whenever anyone asks. You guys need to get
your support in order, or others (like me) are going to bail. RH6.2 is far
more stable than L-M 7.0. It's a simple matter of what works, and how easy
it is to fix what's not.....
Later
Don
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Corbeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 4:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] You people just don't get it
>
>
> Alen Salamun wrote:
>
> > Burkhard Zombronner wrote:
> > > Could you please stop shouting on us !!!
> > Hi!
> >
> > Ich bin nicht "schouting" an euch...heheh
> > (I am not shouting on you all)
> >
> > Only on people, that have a kind of funny approach like
> "...don't use
> > it, don't care...".
> > I have no intetions do shout on anyone, but this really god
> me down in
> > my LiNUX heart...:))
> > Really...
> >
>
> Yes, people could avoid being overly sensitive, and as far as I'm
> concerned, your devotion or astuteness is of a worthy sort.
> However, I
> also need to admit that your intentions weren't initially understood.
> Now that they are, you're correct and I have no problems with your
> initial comments anylonger.
>
> mike
>
>
>
>
