On 2024-04-28 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote:
> On 28/04/2024 06:05, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
>> The router fails all bounces where
>> inbound_srs{} fails, not only the ones that "look SRS'd".> It assumes that you really are SRS'ing all outbounds, therefore > any bounce not SRS (in addition to those with bad SRS) is > de-facto not valid. > If the "all outbounds" does not hold in your configuration > then you would need more complexity for this element. Hello, There is progress. ;-) inbound_srs_failure only handles addresses with valid SRS-syntax (That is what I missed before.) that have not been grabbed by inbound_srs, i.e. they have a wrong checksum or fail the timestamp < 10 day check. These message are rejected with a nice error message. So afaiui the whole point of this router is to produce a nice error instead of a generic "Unrouteable address". - Does this make sense? cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## exim-users-unsubscr...@lists.exim.org ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
