Good morning,
the SRS example in the spec features three routers:
8X-------------------------------------------------------------------
outbound:
[dnslookup router, choose srs-encoding transport when necessary]
inbound_srs:
[try to SRS-decode incoming bounce and redirect to new adddress on
success]
inbound_srs_failure:
driver = redirect
senders = :
domains = +my_domains
# detect inbound bounces which look SRS'd but are invalid
condition = ${if inbound_srs {$local_part} {}}
allow_fail
data = :fail: Invalid SRS recipient address
#... further routers here
8X-------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not get the third one:
Afaict comment and code do not match. The router fails all bounces where
inbound_srs{} fails, not only the ones that "look SRS'd".
Why is it necessary? The inbound_srs-router will have handled the
valid cases so whatever we get now can be handled by the regular
routers. - SRS0=notvalid@my.domain will be handled by the same logic as
any other invalid-localpart@my.domain.
I am sure I am missing something.
TIA, cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscr...@lists.exim.org
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
