On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 16:57 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > I simply urge people to not take these "it's horrible" statements, > without any reference to actual problems that anyone has ever had in > real life and very little understanding of what exactly a flatpak or > snap is, how they are built, or how they work, as gospel.
Hi, in 2016 I tried to build a snap for qjackctl, hence a real-time sound server and real-time audio apps using this sound server were involved. This time I was subscribed to https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft , in the meantime replaced by https://forum.snapcraft.io ;). Nowadays probably some of the old issues are solved, however, apart from security concerns, the snap infrastructure is inappropriate for a lot of domains, while the classic packages or ports approach is appropriate for all domains. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
