On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 23:04 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 12:52 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > I'll answer in-line > > Hi, > I can understand your common use is to reply inline, aka the Outlook > style, but right here it's not the best choice. I do not know whether > your 3.38.3 has it, maybe it does, try to use Alternative Reply > (Ctrl+Alt+R), where you can choose to reply Quoted and then make it > clear what is new text and what you reply to. Using Reply To List is > also preferred here. Thanks for the guidance. > > > The reason why I mentioned the position relative to the Inbox is > > that > > the Evolution manual explicitly says that having folder with > > subfolders and messages under the Inbox can be a problem with > > Evolution > > That's new to me, both that any such thing exists in the Evolution > manual and that it should cause any trouble to Evolution. I have IMAP > accounts connecting to multiple servers with folder structure under > the > Inbox with no problem. > > > I tried creating a new folder directly under the account into which > > I > > could move all these folders but, after creation, it shows up under > > the Inbox. > > Does it do it for every account you have (each on a different > provider) > or on a single account only? This feels like a problem on the > provider > side, like sending/using something libcamel does not understand. This may be a clue as to what is happening. It is a single provider. I contacted them and they replied that one needs to use a namespace set to INBOX and that Evolution removed the ability to do that in the GUI. They instructed me to edit the .source file and that appears to be working. > > > I have tried setting Receive options to show only subscribed and to > > show all. Whenever I do either of those, the folders appear and > > then > > disappear. > > Did you close and run Evolution after such change? It can change > things. Nonetheless, I think the problem can be with the namespace > the > server uses. > > If you can, install the latest version from the Flathub [1] and check > how the problematic account will behave there. I know there had been > done some fixes in the namespace handling. Note that the Flatpak > version launcher "overrides" the one of the host system, thus when > you'd be running the Evolution from the GUI, it will "prefer" the > Flatpak version from the host system version. > > Bye, > Milan > > [1] https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.gnome.Evolution > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list