On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 21:48 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote: > may I propose a version of your script which works fine with set -u ?
Hi, I'm sorry, I do not know what you mean. > I need libical from sources so i'll try to get them but > for now I run out of time. I'll try later. Well, the page had been written to work flawlessly some time ago, the dependencies might change meanwhile, the same as the distro- dependencies (sometimes, the dependency brings in its own dependencies, which are used by the project). I might update the dependencies once I'll get to it. With respect of the libical itself, check the end of the page, the second part of this Troubleshooting section: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/Building#Prepare_Evolution-Data-Server_dependencies > > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/Flatpak > > there isn't flatpack on the current stable debian It's weird: https://flatpak.org/setup/Debian/ > so I can't run your commands AFAIK and I really like the idea to > build from source: I can hack if I dare. In fact, you do build from the source there as well. You can add your patches there, it's only slightly harder (once you know how to add a patch it's simple - Google and flatpak documentation helps in this regard). By the way, I prefer Reply To List (Ctrl+L in evo), instead of Reply To All, on this list. I've no idea whether mutt has anything like that. Bye, Milan _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
