On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 18:39 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Actually I didn't offend any CoC by mentioning that a majority of Linux > users consider a lot of GNOME's decisions as despotic, since this is > the truth.
"GNOME's decisions" do not really exist... There are some teams and maintainers who make decisions though. If you have specific ones in mind, feel free to bring them up 1) in a way that does not insult other humans 2) in a better suited place. I'm afraid that "someone was vocal and complained on the interwebs about stuff they disagree with" is not a logical argument for "hence what I'm writing must be the objective truth". But more important, you missed the point: It's irrelevant what someone considers to be true or not, or good or bad. It's how the choice of words insults people instead of ideas. Shall I call you "despotic" because you maintain software and I and some other folks disagreed with some of your decisions? Is that the so-called "logic" here? > So what you're doing de facto is censorship. Please consider looking up the definitions of the terms "censorship" and "de facto". Or read my last email again. Thanks. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
