On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:52 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > If it was build against 3.18, nothing should break when 3.20 is > > provided at runtime. > > except of the selected color.
Regarding the idea of soname and backwards-compatibility it shouldn't be that way. > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/webkit2gtk > > > > "libgtk-3-dev (>= 3.20.0)" - > > https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/w/webkit2gtk/control-2.12. > > 2 > > -1 > > > > IOW the current version in testing _is_ build against 3.20. The OP > > mentioned to use 2.4.11-1 yesterday, so the OP today should run > > Please do not mix the two. You reference 2.12.2, then make decisions > on 2.4.11 (2.4 is much less than 2.12). No, I explained that the OP needs to upgrade his Debian testing today. The OP mentioned to use Debian testing, without pinning and 2.4.11-1. Actually, at least today testing provides 2.12.2-1, IOW the OP needs to run sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade to fix this issue, assumed the OP does really use debian testing without pinning. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
