må. den 08. 02. 2016 klokka 09.51 (+0000) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > > > > > It puzzles me though, that after converting from SHA-1 to SHA-256, > > Evolution still uses SHA-1. What can be the reason for that, you think? > > No it's not, your messages are signed using a SHA256 digest. At the > bottom of a signed/encrypted message in Evolution you will see a > coloured bar showing the PGP status - green if everything is OK, yellow > if valid but not verifiable and red if something wrong. Clicking on > the icon at the far left end of the bar will give you more information. > The message I'm replying to says: > > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1 > gpg: Signature made Mon 08 Feb 2016 08:48:43 GMT using RSA key ID 7C174863 > gpg: using PGP trust model > gpg: Good signature from "Stig Roar Wangberg < srwangb...@hotmail.com > >" [unknown] > gpg: aka "Stig Roar Wangberg < s...@openmailbox.org > >" [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: D1AA 5023 275C 4FAC 7EF5 076B 20AD 6E59 7C17 > 4863 > gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA256, key algorithm rsa4096 > > Why do you think it's using SAH-1? > > P.
Woah - that's so cool! Thank you so much! Now I'm happy! I've learned so much! And also understands a great deal more than just a couple of hours ago. I think my Evolution is perfect now, and finally I can help others too, to set it up. I'm truly grateful, and thanks for your patience and to the point answers! This is great! SRW
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
