>
>
> It puzzles me though, that after converting from SHA-1 to SHA-256,
> Evolution still uses SHA-1. What can be the reason for that, you think?
No it's not, your messages are signed using a SHA256 digest. At the
bottom of a signed/encrypted message in Evolution you will see a
coloured bar showing the PGP status - green if everything is OK, yellow
if valid but not verifiable and red if something wrong. Clicking on
the icon at the far left end of the bar will give you more information.
The message I'm replying to says:
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: Signature made Mon 08 Feb 2016 08:48:43 GMT using RSA key ID 7C174863
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: Good signature from "Stig Roar Wangberg < srwangb...@hotmail.com
>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Stig Roar Wangberg < s...@openmailbox.org
>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: D1AA 5023 275C 4FAC 7EF5 076B 20AD 6E59 7C17 4863
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA256, key algorithm rsa4096
Why do you think it's using SAH-1?
P.
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
