Am Sonntag, den 27.11.2011, 13:10 +0000 schrieb Pete Biggs: > Well it's fairly obvious? You've been going on for ages about it not > filtering your messages, therefore I thought it was fairly safe to > assume that, err, it wasn't working as intended. You´re definitely right - if my intention on using bogofilter was right. Sadly seems to me, all documentations I´ve found "started in the middle". I couldn´t find any lines about the basics of bogofilter (otherwise I´d known, who this Mr. Fisher is ;-)
> bogofilter -t message.file > > this will print 'Y' if it's spam, 'N' if it's not and 'U' if it's > unsure. There are other command line options, do 'man bogofilter' to > find them. It's not difficult finding out this information. That´s approximately what I was searching for, but not a single mail for a test. That wouldn´t say anything about the confidence of my data. I was looking for kind of test data set with a known desired output, so that I can analyze, how good my data set is already "trained". Only seeing in alldays running, that the spam-folder still remains the same - empty, is very disappointing without knowing why ... (as Ross Vandergrift wanted to point out, too, I assume ...) -- getting on, Thomas _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
