On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 16:46 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > An obvious solution to this is to do what Kmail does. When the message > > being replied to contains a List-Post header, Ctrl-R should do the same > > as Ctrl-L. There should also be a Reply-To-Author command for the rare > > case when the reply should be directed to the message Reply-To field, > > presumably the author's personal address. > > Uh, > > "Yes! Please?" ยน
Patrick later retracted that request, because that would be overriding the *private* reply function to send a *public* message. There's debate about the relative merits of reply-to-all vs. reply-to-list, but most people agree that the *worst* thing we can do is send a reply in public when the user asked us to reply *privately* by using the 'Reply to Sender' menu option (Ctrl-R). Once private information has been sent to the wrong people, especially a public list, it can *never* be fixed. The fixes we've committed (summarised in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624204#c16 ) preserve a clear distinction between private and non-private reply actions -- while occasionally prompting users to think again, if it's likely that they've chosen the wrong one. And giving you the option to make the default 'Group Reply' actually reply-to-list. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list