Dnia 2009-02-23, pon o godzinie 18:42 +0100, William John Murray pisze:
> 
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 15:35 +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > Dnia 2009-02-23, pon o godzinie 11:43 +0100, William John Murray pisze:
> > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 10:34 +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > > > [cut]
> > > > >    Any ideas?
> > > > only one: you should use Evolution packages from Rawhide.
> > > > 
> > >   Hi Patryk,
> > >           I don't see it in rawhide. e.g.:
> > > http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/Packages/
> > > Am I looking in the wrong place?
> > The place is fine. Take a deeper look. I found package called
> > evolution-2.25.91-1.fc11.i386.rpm which looks like beta before 2.26
> > AFAIK Rawhide is unstable version of fedora. Since Matthew Barnes wrote
> > explicitly on his page http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/ , that his MAPI
> > packages "requires the Evolution packages from Rawhide", thus you
> > probably should use evo 2.25.something.minor.
> > 
>   Ach, I misunderstood. I tried to configure it from a rawhide machine,
> and that did not work. So then I went to F10 - which install but doesn'y
> run. But F10 plus 472MB from 'yum update evolution --enablerepo=rawhide'
> is working, at least at some level!
>         Thank you very much,
No problem. BTW, i have never used fedora ;)

-- 
Kind Regards
Patryk "LeadMan" Benderz
IT Specialist
Linux Registered User #377521

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to