On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 15:35 +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> Dnia 2009-02-23, pon o godzinie 11:43 +0100, William John Murray pisze:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 10:34 +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > > [cut]
> > > >    Any ideas?
> > > only one: you should use Evolution packages from Rawhide.
> > > 
> >   Hi Patryk,
> >           I don't see it in rawhide. e.g.:
> > http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/Packages/
> > Am I looking in the wrong place?
> The place is fine. Take a deeper look. I found package called
> evolution-2.25.91-1.fc11.i386.rpm which looks like beta before 2.26
> AFAIK Rawhide is unstable version of fedora. Since Matthew Barnes wrote
> explicitly on his page http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/ , that his MAPI
> packages "requires the Evolution packages from Rawhide", thus you
> probably should use evo 2.25.something.minor.
> 
  Ach, I misunderstood. I tried to configure it from a rawhide machine,
and that did not work. So then I went to F10 - which install but doesn'y
run. But F10 plus 472MB from 'yum update evolution --enablerepo=rawhide'
is working, at least at some level!
        Thank you very much,
                 Bill

-- 
Scanned by iCritical.
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to