non-Mail functions aside, I disagree with your statement that Evolution is vastly superior when it comes to functionality. Thunderbird now has the equivalent of vFolders (search folders) and is far more customizable in many ways. Beyond that, it has a huge library of extensions to add functionality. I prefer Evo to Thunderbird, but increased functionality in the Mail component is not why. On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:22 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2007-11-07, 17:37 GMT, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > No doubt, but in a way that's actually more worrying. i.e. Evo > > works for some people most of the time and for other people not > > so much. > > I think we should admit the honest truth that Evolution is less > reliable comparing to my previous kMail (and probably also > comparing to Thunderbird, but I have less experience with that -- > although I have to admit that some of that experience was pretty > horrible, including data loss). On the other comparing to other > two, it is vastly superior in amount of functionality. Have you > tried vFolders with kmail? > > Matěj > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
